ACE Debate 10R 2016

To counter this, I say "18-20 aged people were involved in more than 800,00 crashes." (Driving age shouldn't be raised). So what does this mean then? 18-20, hmmm, wait that's the age you want to raise it too, and their's more crashes too, maybe if we keep it, the extra actual driving experience will make use.

Might I ask how they spun out of control and who was responsible.

"more experienced cause they got the extra year or so of learning", your 16 and you get your license with no training other than drivers ed, your chances of dying are high, your 18 and after the law has been raised, you get your license, you sill have the exact same chances of which if you were 16. I've said it posted it once before and I'll post it again.

But newer generations wouldn't start training until the amount of time before they start training as it would be if it was kept the same, drivers ed class would be moved up to a different grade because they think it's useless to do it 2-3 years before they have to do it.

Well, how about this then "Men of all age are 77% more likely to kill someone while driving than women." Revoke all men's license then why don't we.

So because of kids rediculous idea to drive 60 on the road, every person should get theirs revoked

So you're agreeing with us even though your on the other side?

What about the 70-80-year-olds who have trouble with seeing, why don't we just take away their licences too and nobody is stupid unless your the barreling down the streets.

Not to be mean but this one person out of possible millions.

You might "They are more mature and they'll be fine.". The brain will not fully mature until your early 20's, and yes they have matured more, but others have not and you still don't have enough experience.