To counter this, I say "18-20 aged people were involved in more than 800,00 crashes." (Driving age shouldn't be raised). So what does this mean then? 18-20, hmmm, wait that's the age you want to raise it too, and their's more crashes too, maybe if we keep it, the extra actual driving experience will make use.
"more experienced cause they got the extra year or so of learning", your 16 and you get your license with no training other than drivers ed, your chances of dying are high, your 18 and after the law has been raised, you get your license, you sill have the exact same chances of which if you were 16. I've said it posted it once before and I'll post it again.
But newer generations wouldn't start training until the amount of time before they start training as it would be if it was kept the same, drivers ed class would be moved up to a different grade because they think it's useless to do it 2-3 years before they have to do it.
"more experienced cause they got the extra year or so of learning", your 16 and you get your license with no training other than drivers ed, your chances of dying are high, your 18 and after the law has been raised, you get your license, you sill have the exact same chances of which if you were 16.