Return to CreateDebate.comhswanson2 • Join this debate community

ACE Debate 10R 2016


Debate Info

125
87
Keep Driving Age Raise Driving Age
Debate Score:212
Arguments:101
Total Votes:281
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Keep Driving Age (55)
 
 Raise Driving Age (43)

Debate Creator

hswanson(59) pic



Driving Age

Keep Driving Age

Side Score: 125
VS.

Raise Driving Age

Side Score: 87
5 points

They shouldn't raise the driving age because 16 is the age when kids start getting jobs and they need to be able to drive themselves.

Side: Keep Driving Age
4 points

And think about the how much rage there will be if it is raised, 10 of 1,000 of kids would be screaming because they got their license revoked for no reason.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21bwendt(21) Disputed
2 points

That may happen sometimes but most of the time their license is removed for a reason

Side: Raise Driving Age
1 point

To support Xander, the parents would also not be excited because they would have to continue chauffeuring their kids for an extra two years. Says drive-safely.net.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21bwendt(21) Disputed
1 point

Kids can Bike and that is way better n the economy itself

Side: Raise Driving Age
21kwagner(12) Disputed
1 point

Though this may seem far fetched, but kids on bikes are even more likely to die from a care crash because other kids are still bad drivers and might actually be the ones to hit them.

Side: Keep Driving Age
4 points

If you do raise the driving age, you are judging someone when they haven't stepped into the car, you say there irresponsible before they've got into an accident(Should the driving age be raised to 18, section no).

Side: Keep Driving Age
4 points

It's like saying someone should not have a piece if cheese because someone has choked on it, it is illogical.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21mcartwrigh Disputed
3 points

But this more reasonable, kids at a young age should not have there license because A there stupid and B there's a chance of getting your life taken away

Side: Raise Driving Age
4 points

Kids cause accidents because of inexperience, not age which is why they shouldn't raise the driving age.

Side: Keep Driving Age
4 points

If you change tha age to 18 you will just make them less experienced at an older age.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21bwendt(21) Disputed
2 points

Younger teens tend to have inexperience which can get them in more trouble then they want to be in

Side: Raise Driving Age
21xshampo(12) Disputed
2 points

But 18-year-olds will still have the inexperience if the law is raised.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21mcartwrigh Disputed
2 points

Exactly, if they raised the driving age, the kids would get the extra 2 years of learning

Side: Raise Driving Age
21xshampo(12) Disputed
2 points

But newer generations wouldn't start training until the amount of time before they start training as it would be if it was kept the same, drivers ed class would be moved up to a different grade because they think it's useless to do it 2-3 years before they have to do it.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21kwagner(12) Disputed
1 point

But some kids are just born bad drivers and those years won't help them

Side: Keep Driving Age
3 points

18 is the age where most people start drinking, this might lead to more drunk driving accidents

Side: Keep Driving Age
21mlotten(10) Disputed
2 points

Actually, most kids start drinking in the early 20's, not 18 that's illegal.

Side: Raise Driving Age
2 points

that's true and you can start drinking no matter how old or young some 16-year olds have started drinking too

Side: Raise Driving Age
21lelliott(5) Disputed
1 point

Some kids start drinking at the age of 18 because they go off to college and they have the freedom that they didn't have while under their parent's roof. Raising the driving age will be more deadly with the 18-year-olds with drinks in their hands.

Side: Keep Driving Age
Kaden(9) Disputed
1 point

Although it is illegal for kids to drink in their teen years that doesn't stop them from doing it. They could be peer pressured into drinking at a party. www.dosomething.org agrees alcohol consumption in the U.S is a problem for teens.

Side: Keep Driving Age
3 points

Some kids think that driving is just a game. If kids get educated and told that driving is much more than a game at a younger age, then there will be fewer car crashes. The kids will know that driving is more than a game and people can get seriously hurt in driving.

Side: Keep Driving Age
2 points

If we change the driving age it won't make the kids more experienced and ready to drive a car, if you are trying to save a life from in you will really only give them 2 more years, 2 years that they spend in a school anyways.

Side: Keep Driving Age
2 points

Men are 77% more likely to kill someone while driving but that doesn't mean only girls should be able to drive.

Side: Keep Driving Age
2 points

Why punish all 16-year-olds when only a handful are bad drivers?

Side: Keep Driving Age
21obuss(11) Disputed
1 point

To counter this, there are way more than a handful of bad drivers and it's not even bad drivers there are just a lot of drivers that don't take it seriously and cause accidents. Evidence for this is 16-year-old drivers have more accidents per highway mile than any other age group. This shows that teens should not be behind the wheel at age 16 because that's the best time for accidents. Source: John M. Crisp. More evidence is, 15% of all drivers in fatal crashes are between 15 and 20. This percent shows that we need to raise the driving age to reduce fatal crashes. Source: CSMonitor

Side: Raise Driving Age
2 points

John M. Crisp states, studies show that risky behavior affects 16-17-year-olds just as much as males into their early twenties even. Even though it say males into their early twenties, risky behaviors would still affect women after 16 or 17, just maybe not into their twenties.

Side: Keep Driving Age
2 points

We shouldn't change to driving age because that wouldn't make a difference. One article says sixteen-year-olds crash more then eighteen-year-olds but that isn't a fair argument because eighteen-year-olds have more experience in driving then a sixteen-year-old so raising he driving age would make new drivers older and with as much experience as the sixteen-year-old had. Therefore raising the driving age is not the solution to the problem here, so we should keep the driving age as is and find a different resolution.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21mlotten(10) Disputed
4 points

You say that if we change the age the crash number will go down but I disagree the higher the age for drivers the more experienced they are. Because 18 years old is technically an adult so they are more experienced and smarter about being adults. While 16 years old are teens that have not had their brain fully grown. Therefore, The age should be changed for all age drivers safety.

Side: Raise Driving Age
21mcartwrigh Disputed
3 points

To counter claim this, it does make a change, you're saying and extra two years wouldn't make a difference? The extra two years gives the students an opportunity to get more comfotrable and make sure they feel strong and it will make the students less stresed.

Side: Raise Driving Age
21bwendt(21) Disputed
3 points

Moving the driving age up it can give them more time for experience

Side: Raise Driving Age
2 points

But some kids are just born bad drivers, 2 more years might not make a difference

Side: Raise Driving Age
21kbartlein(1) Disputed
2 points

You start learning to drive a year before you can get your license meaning they would have as much experience in the car as a 16-year-old if the age was raised to 18. So saying that they would be more comfortable is a false statement. What you think is people should learn to drive sooner and gain more supervised experience and lessons.

Side: Keep Driving Age
2 points

We should not raise the driving age. It is way easier on the parents. Kids will be able to drive to school. That will help their parents because then their parents don't need to drive them or pay for bussing. Also, Kids can drive home from their friend's house on a Friday

night. That is why the driving age shouldn't be raised.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21mcartwrigh Disputed
3 points

I'm sure that having there kids not dead and not comfortable on the road, will make be better than cutting two ages and possible of taking your life, so I'm sure parents won't mind of having the extra two years and making sure there kids are safe.

Side: Raise Driving Age
21rzuleger(4) Clarified
2 points

I can see why you say this but that is so dumb. The reason why kids get into accidents is because they are inexperienced. What will it help them if they are 18. They are still new to driving. The only thing that would help them would be if there are more driving lessons. How would it help them if they are still inexperienced at the age of 18?

Side: Keep Driving Age
21mlotten(10) Disputed
3 points

Will it be easier on the parents to have to pay medical bills for their 16-year-old who flipped their car.

Side: Raise Driving Age
2 points

Even if they have more life experienced how would that help you driving. How would it be more beneficial to wait? They still have the same amount of driving experience. What is the difference between being 16 and 18

Side: Keep Driving Age
2 points

People say you could just take the bus to school but what about after school. After school parents would have to bring them to practices after school all the way throw high school because they could not drive them self to school. They would have to have their parents bring them to the practices. Or the age could be 16 and the kids would bring their self to practice some of the days or years in high school.

Side: Keep Driving Age
2 points

One reason why I believe the driving age should stay the same is because of the inconvenience that the kids and the parents share.

Kids will need some sort of transportation when they are in high school and parents do not want to be the ones to transport them everywhere. They will need to go places such as school, friends houses, sports tournaments/games, and jobs. Most kids around the U.S start working at age 16. Parents have had to drive their kids around for 16 years. They probably do not want to wait until they are off to college for them to start driving.

A reporter, Aj Rox, says, "The majority of parents have to take their kids to other activities, they don't have time to chauffeur their kids around to different high school events."

(Evidence from me and a reporter AJ Rox.)

Side: Keep Driving Age
1 point

You might "They are more mature and they'll be fine.". The brain will not fully mature until your early 20's, and yes they have matured more, but others have not and you still don't have enough experience.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21bwendt(21) Disputed
2 points

then those who have not enough experience wait until you do

Side: Raise Driving Age
1 point

I believe that the driving age should stay the same.

Raising the driving age could cause more inexperienced drivers on the road.

It is a known fact that when you are younger you adapt to things more quickly. Even at the age of 16 you could learn things more quickly than an 18-year-old. Such as driving. (Evidence from the article "Should the driving age be raised to 18?" by Alex Koroknay-Palicz.)

Alex Koroknay-Palicz, a worker in the National Youth Rights Association says on the NO side of the article, "Should The Driving Age be Raised to 18", "Studies show that it is inexperience, not age, that causes accidents. Raising the driving age will just create inexperienced, accident-prone drivers at age 18 instead of 16."

Side: Keep Driving Age
21obuss(11) Disputed
2 points

They say that raising the driving age could cause more inexperienced drivers on the road but as you age the more mature you are. Evidence for this is, age 16 is when the peer pressure is raised which leads to more immaturity. The brain is still developing its skills to make decisions and solve problems. Source: Aspen Education Group. More evidence is, the 3 best ways to keep teens safe when driving is increase seat belt use among teenagers, implement graduated driver license and reduce teens' access to alcohol. These changes aren't going to happen soon so we need to reduce the driving age. Source: Aspen Education Group. Therefore, the driving age should be raised because 16 year olds are not mature enough.

Side: Raise Driving Age
1 point

Learning at an early age. Kids could think that driving is a game, having seen it in video games and on TV. If the kids start driving at age 16, then they would learn at a younger age that driving is much more than a game. If you learn something at a young age, then you will become more experienced in that field when you get older. This will put more experienced drivers on the road, making for less car crashes.

Side: Keep Driving Age
1 point

One reason why I believe that the driving age should stay the same is because the teenagers need to learn the responsibility of driving while still under their parent's control.

Teens need to know how to take care of a car and stay safe while in it when they are still under their parent's roof. They need to know this before they go off to college and need to know how to drive right away.

If the teenagers misuse a vehicle, the parents can punish them and not just have them pay a fine. The parents can help them understand what they did wrong and how to fix it. Plus, the insurance is cheaper with a teenage driver driving.

(All evidence from CNN and the article,"Misusing Vehicles")

Side: Keep Driving Age
1 point

Let's think about keeping it fair. I don't think that anyone thinks that it is fair to raise the driving age because kids got in an accident. What about the kids who haven't even started driving. It isn't fair that they get punished for something someone else did, what happened to someone else.

Side: Keep Driving Age
1 point

counter claim: I can see why you think the driving age should be raised. But I think that your reasons do not outweight my reasons.

Side: Keep Driving Age
0 points

Some people say that the driving age should be change such as the kids brains are not yet developed or there would be steeps to driving with people if you had the driving age changed. I think the driving age should not be changed for many different reasons. There has been many different talks about wether or not there should be a change in the driving age. I think the driving age should not be changed for many different reasons such as, it does not matter what age they are, It still would not teach them the right way to drive or work, lastly they would not be able to drive their self-places.

It does not matter how old they are. It does not matter how old they are most of the crashes at the young age is just because of inexperience. You would just be delaying the time that they will be inexperienced. If they raise it up the time that they are new is just being delayed to a later day and year. (A.J. Rox, pg1, 2016)

Also it would not teach kids the right way to drive or work if you raise the age limit. "In fact studies show that most adults start drinking heavily at the age of 18." If you were to raise the driving age to 18 the kids will not be taught the right way to drive because they think that it is okay to drive when they are drunk because they did it at a young age. Another thing they will not be able to drive them selfs to a job so at a young age the kids will not learn work ethic and how to work hard. If kids are not working hard well they are young when they get older they will not know how to work hard in their job when they are older.

Lastly the kids would not be able to drive them selfs to different places. Such as if the kid had a practice of some sort in high school and their parents have to work so they have to get them selfs to the practice. If you do not go to so many practice you might be off the team and you would be off the team because you could not get to practice. Also the kids will bot date a lot in high school because they can not drive their self there. They will date a lot in collage and will be inexperience and date way to much in collage such as if it was like high school if they had a car.

Side: Keep Driving Age
0 points

You say if you raise the driving age limit you would have more experience. But I disagree it should be the same because when you would change the driving age you would not give them more experience you would just be delaying the inexperience time and not giving them more experience. Says A.J.Rox.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21mcartwrigh Disputed
1 point

But also, it age was raised, 18-year old would be experienced and reduce less accidents because there more experienced, and there immature at 16, and they will and can be simply distracted and they will be texting while driving

Side: Raise Driving Age
21kwagner(12) Disputed
3 points

Who says kids won't be just as immature and distracted at 18?

Side: Keep Driving Age
2 points

We should raise the driving level because adults at 18 to 19 are more mature about the safety of driving than 16 years olds that are not making the most mature decisions. Therefore, we should increase the age, or our roads will stay dangerous for drivers of all ages.

Side: Raise Driving Age
2 points

I agree with Mason, all teenagers need that extra boost of learning and learn more about the rod

Side: Raise Driving Age
21bmcconnell(4) Disputed
1 point

True they are more mature, but most crashes are caused by inexperience. So instead of having inexperienced 16-year-olds, you have inexperienced 18-19 year olds driving. It won't do anything just because someone is more mature.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21xshampo(12) Disputed
0 points

"more experienced cause they got the extra year or so of learning", your 16 and you get your license with no training other than drivers ed, your chances of dying are high, your 18 and after the law has been raised, you get your license, you sill have the exact same chances of which if you were 16. I've said it posted it once before and I'll post it again.

Side: Keep Driving Age
2 points

Teens can be irresponsible. Humans brains are more developed at the age of 18, which means you will be more responsible. That will then reduce the amount of multitasking drivers, says John M. Crisp of Scripps Howard News Service. John also states raising the age won't fix everything, but it's a message to teens that handling several thousand pound machines is serious business.

Side: Raise Driving Age
2 points

Essay writing tips agree's, not starting to drive until the age of 18 is also environmentally friendly. If teens don't start until 18 that's two years of co2 emissions that have been avoided. Now if the whole world did this our problem with co2 would be a lot smaller. In addition, a car releases about 20 pounds of carbon dioxide per gallon. Think about how much that would add up to in two years!

Side: Raise Driving Age
2 points

They say the changing the driving age is pointless and will only do worse for American teens but I think it can make a difference if we give it a try because first, teenage driving is causing death. In December 2005, four teens from Chicago went out for a late night drive and got into a horrible accident. Two of the four teenagers were killed that night, a 16 and a 17-year old. Along with that, between 1995-2004, there were 30,917 fatalities that involved 15-17-year olds.

The second reason that the government should raise the driving age is because it not only affects the teenagers but it also affect other poeple. For example, Daily Mail stated that a 26-year-old doctor was killed by a teenage driver and she was affected by that and her family was very sad. Her mother said, " I loved Margaret from her first breath and I will love, mourn and miss her until my last." Another piece of evidence is that if the government does change the driving age there will be fewer deaths because as teenagers become adults they mature and are more responsible for the choices they make.

The last reason that the legal driving age should rise is because it's a huge factor to safety, a lot of people think it's always about safety but it is a very important part of our daily life. When teenagers get into accidents about 2/3 of the people who are killed are pedestrians, passengers and people in cars that teenage drivers strike. Another reason why it's a huge factor to safety is because teenage brains aren't fully developed yet so everytime they go on the road it's a risk to them and those around them. Eventhough it is always a risk to go driving for anyone, there is less of a chance for a 30-year old than a 16-year old to get into an acciedent.

Therefore, the legal driving age should rise to 18 because teenage driving can cause death, it not only affects the teenagers but it also affect other poeple and it is a huge factor to safety.

Side: Raise Driving Age
2 points

Parents can get worried sick when their kid takes the car out for the evening. All night they are worried about what could happen to them, agrees John Keilman and Grace Aduroja, Tribune staff reporters.

Side: Raise Driving Age
2 points

For teens, there is peer pressure everywhere. If they are at a party they drove to, they might be pressured into drinking and then not be able to drive home. Then that would also worry their parents.

Side: Raise Driving Age
Kaden(9) Clarified
1 point

To clarify this statement that we should raise the driving age because of peer pressure and worried parents, the info comes from the source blog.allstate.com.

Side: Keep Driving Age
2 points

They say that raising the driving age is pointless but I believe that the driving age should be raised because it can cause death. Evidence for this is, 4 boys from Chicago were driving on Dec. 29th. The car spun out of control and the boys hit multiple objects on and off the road. That left leaving the driver, a 16-year-old, and his friend, 17, dead. The 2 other boys didn't die but had many injuries. Source: Representative John D'Amico. He also states that "All 50 states prohibit 16 you olds from drinking alcohol, buying cigarettes, and purchasing handguns. Yet somehow most states are willing to put them in charge of a car, which could potentially be a deadly weapon." This shows that states prohibit most of the teen death factors except driving which could have the most percentage in some situations.

Side: Raise Driving Age
21xshampo(12) Disputed
1 point

Might I ask how they spun out of control and who was responsible.

Side: Keep Driving Age
2 points

If we don't raise the driving age you will be increasing the deaths in teens. Evidence for this is, 4 boys from Chicago were driving on Dec. 29th. The car spun out of control and the boys hit multiple objects on and off the road. That left leaving the driver, a 16-year-old, and his friend, 17, dead. The 2 other boys didn't die but had many injuries. Source: Representative John D'Amico. He also states that "All 50 states prohibit 16 you olds from drinking alcohol, buying cigarettes, and purchasing handguns. Yet somehow most states are willing to put them in charge of a car, which could potentially be a deadly weapon." This shows that states prohibit most of the teen death factors except driving which could have the most percentage in some situations.

Side: Raise Driving Age
1 point

I say that we should raise the driving age because one the car could be a weapon in some cases. In all 50,states people prohibit kids from using drugs, and handguns and those are weapons to others. We shouldn't let young teens have a car that can kill people.

Side: Raise Driving Age
21xshampo(12) Disputed
1 point

But as stated in the article "Driving age shouldn't be raised" and I quote "Driving is based on experience and being able to make good choices."

Side: Keep Driving Age
3 points

If you change tha age to 18 you will just make them less experienced at an older age.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21bwendt(21) Disputed
2 points

Making good choices is actually a big part in driving there are a lot of things you can choose which is either good or bad and it can be a life or death matter

Side: Raise Driving Age
1 point

They should raise the driving age because there has been for accidents with young teens then adults

Side: Raise Driving Age
21knewhouse(2) Disputed
3 points

But studies show than men in their 20 get in just as many accidents as teens do so if we change tha law of driving age we should also change the law for the gender.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21kwagner(12) Disputed
3 points

However, kids cause accidents because of inexperience which might mean that it's not their fault that they haven't practiced driving much (it might even be the parent's fault).

Side: Keep Driving Age
21xshampo(12) Disputed
3 points

To counter this, I say "18-20 aged people were involved in more than 800,00 crashes." (Driving age shouldn't be raised.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21xshampo(12) Disputed
2 points

Well, how about this then "Men of all age are 77% more likely to kill someone while driving than women." Revoke all men's license then why don't we.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21lelliott(5) Disputed
2 points

She says that they should raise the driving age because there have been more accidents with young teens than adults. But I disagree because I believe that the driving age should not rise because there will be more accidents with the 18-year-alds. I think this because it is a known fact that when you are younger you adapt to things more quickly. Even in two years they could learn things more easily than an 18-year-old. As such as driving. Alex Koroknay-Patlicz says that kids who start driving at age 16 are going to be at the same level of driving as an 18-year-old who is just starting to drive. There is not going to be more of an advantage to the 18-year-old because they are 2 years older. Therefore, I believe that the driving age should not be risen because it is not going to prevent more accidents from happening.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21kwagner(12) Disputed
1 point

Though that may be true, studies have shown that men are 77% more likely to kill someone while driving, but that doesn't mean that only women should be allowed to drive

Side: Keep Driving Age
1 point

We should have the age higher for drivers to get there license. I say this because kids at a young age like 16 are care and reckless. Studies show that at the first month when kids get there license, More accidents occur through that time period through out out the whole year. Also, drivers ed isn't enough, "You only read a book. And get on the road once and that's on the small roads, but what happens when you get on the highway, you'll panic, and once isn't enough and doesn't teach them enough about road safety. Also raising the age can reduce obesity. So far sense driving ages haven't gone up. There have been a increase of 66 percent for obesity. Also if the ages get raised higher, to like 18, the kids could be more active and fully grown and more experienced cause they got the extra year or so of learning. Also if they don't raise it, the kids are still immature and will try to show off and eventually get killed, and will be distracted more easily and will text while they drive cause they think they will be cool until they don't notice there about to run a red light and get demolished.

Also 16-year-old's don't know about diving, they don't know enough about it and they can get in a crash because they didn't know if they could go or not and that will not result in a happy way. But now if they raised it, kids would get the extra help they need and that gives them time to be more mature and which will lead to paying attention more.

Side: Raise Driving Age
21knewhouse(2) Disputed
2 points

but of they start driving at 18 they still will get into more accidents because they have not done it before and kids are still reckless at the age of 18.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21bwendt(21) Disputed
2 points

they are but if they have more training it will still be better on the roads

Side: Raise Driving Age
21mcartwrigh Disputed
1 point

But they are more mature and on the verge of growing up. And 16 year olds are still kids.

Side: Raise Driving Age
2 points

I agree with Matthew Because kids in high school and little in college like to show off and don't know the safety of driving until they get t-boned by a semi on the highway.

Side: Raise Driving Age
21xshampo(12) Disputed
2 points

So because of kids rediculous idea to drive 60 on the road, every person should get theirs revoked

Side: Keep Driving Age
21kwagner(12) Disputed
2 points

However, this is generalizing that all sixteen-year-olds are bad at driving. That is like saying that just because men (of all ages) are 77% more likely to kill someone while driving, then only girls should be able to drive.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21xshampo(12) Disputed
1 point

"more experienced cause they got the extra year or so of learning", your 16 and you get your license with no training other than drivers ed, your chances of dying are high, your 18 and after the law has been raised, you get your license, you sill have the exact same chances of which if you were 16.

Side: Keep Driving Age
1 point

I agree When you are younger you tend to think that nothing bad can happen to you and then it does. My mom has been in 7 accidents 6 of them were when you was younger and had her driver's license

Side: Raise Driving Age
21xshampo(12) Disputed
2 points

Not to be mean but this one person out of possible millions.

Side: Keep Driving Age
1 point

We should have the age of driving raised because kids at a young age are reckless. Studies should that at the first month when kids get there license, more accidents occur than ever throughout that year, also drivers ed isn't just enough, "You only read a book and get on the road once, that's not enough experience. See if we had the age higher, we would have more opportunities to get on the road and learn more about the road

Side: Raise Driving Age
0 points

It's dangerous for 16-year-olds to drive. In 1995 through 2004, 30,917 people were killed by 15-19-year-olds, these people include the drivers and other citizens nearby. States the AAA Foundation for traffic safety. Traffic deaths are also the leading death cause for American teenagers, accounting for one-third of teenage deaths, says the Center for Disease Control.

Side: Raise Driving Age
-1 points

I say that we should raise the driving level because teens are not ready for the responsibility. One piece shows that between 1995 to 2004 30,917 fatalities in accidents are teens ages 15-17. Therefore, we should raise it to 18 years of age because young adults are more responsible and will make the fatalities count go down.

Side: Raise Driving Age
21kwagner(12) Disputed
3 points

Bad drivers will always be bad drivers, raising the driving age would only delay the inevitable.

Side: Keep Driving Age
21bwendt(21) Disputed
2 points

but really how many bad drivers are out there. Thier are some bad drivers that can become good drivers if they have more training

Side: Raise Driving Age
21xshampo(12) Disputed
1 point

To counter this, I say "18-20 aged people were involved in more than 800,00 crashes." (Driving age shouldn't be raised). So what does this mean then? 18-20, hmmm, wait that's the age you want to raise it too, and their's more crashes too, maybe if we keep it, the extra actual driving experience will make use.

Side: Keep Driving Age