ACE Debate 10R 2016

But also, it age was raised, 18-year old would be experienced and reduce less accidents because there more experienced, and there immature at 16, and they will and can be simply distracted and they will be texting while driving

I'm sure that having there kids not dead and not comfortable on the road, will make be better than cutting two ages and possible of taking your life, so I'm sure parents won't mind of having the extra two years and making sure there kids are safe.

To counter claim this, it does make a change, you're saying and extra two years wouldn't make a difference? The extra two years gives the students an opportunity to get more comfotrable and make sure they feel strong and it will make the students less stresed.

We should have the age of driving raised because kids at a young age are reckless. Studies should that at the first month when kids get there license, more accidents occur than ever throughout that year, also drivers ed isn't just enough, "You only read a book and get on the road once, that's not enough experience. See if we had the age higher, we would have more opportunities to get on the road and learn more about the road

Not if they get an extra 2 years about learning about the road

Exactly, if they raised the driving age, the kids would get the extra 2 years of learning

But they are more mature and on the verge of growing up. And 16 year olds are still kids.

But this more reasonable, kids at a young age should not have there license because A there stupid and B there's a chance of getting your life taken away

But why have your license when your going to get it taken away?

I agree with Mason, all teenagers need that extra boost of learning and learn more about the rod