Though that may be true, studies have shown that men are 77% more likely to kill someone while driving, but that doesn't mean that only women should be allowed to drive

Who says kids won't be just as immature and distracted at 18?

But some kids are just born bad drivers and those years won't help them

Though this may seem far fetched, but kids on bikes are even more likely to die from a care crash because other kids are still bad drivers and might actually be the ones to hit them.

But some kids are just born bad drivers, 2 more years might not make a difference

Exactly Xander, why take away the licenses of all 16-year-olds when some haven't even gotten to get behind the wheel yet?

Why punish all 16-year-olds when only a handful are bad drivers?

Men are 77% more likely to kill someone while driving but that doesn't mean only girls should be able to drive.

However, this is generalizing that all sixteen-year-olds are bad at driving. That is like saying that just because men (of all ages) are 77% more likely to kill someone while driving, then only girls should be able to drive.

Bad drivers will always be bad drivers, raising the driving age would only delay the inevitable.

18 is the age where most people start drinking, this might lead to more drunk driving accidents

However, kids cause accidents because of inexperience which might mean that it's not their fault that they haven't practiced driving much (it might even be the parent's fault).

Kids cause accidents because of inexperience, not age which is why they shouldn't raise the driving age.

They shouldn't raise the driving age because 16 is the age when kids start getting jobs and they need to be able to drive themselves.